Skip to main content

Alien: Covenant (2017) - Jason X in a toga

A film that raises big questions—about gods, monsters, and the cost of creation—and then answers them with pseudo-intellectual hooha and a bunch of splatters. It’s poetry for meatballs. A creation myth written by someone who forgot the difference between being mysterious and confounding.

There’s a premise here. But it never shows up on screen. The director described the film as having [layers of metaphor].  By minute 20, my response to him would be: “Uh nah bruh … you ain’t that deep.”

The characters are emotionally unbalanced idiots. This crew is supposedly trained for deep interstellar colonization.

  • No backup plan. No safety protocols. No sense of hierarchy or mission discipline.
  • They panic, scream, and grieve like they’ve just lost soulmates—they are too young to have known each other or been through anything more severe than a power point presentation.
  • They lack agency. They don’t make decisions—they react, flail, and sometimes avoid shooting themselves or blowing themselves up.

You’re told how important they are to each other and the mission, but holy moly, there’s no way you believe it. They’re not empathetic—they’re screaming and crying and one praying hands emoji.

Then there is Chekhov on meth. The film doesn’t understand suspense. It introduces a “gun” to the audience—and then reveals it to the characters less than five minutes later. There’s no anticipation or slow burn. In a film that’s supposed to be philosophical horror, the lack of tension is a real buzzkill.

I think David was supposed to be Lucifer in a lab coat. The film gesticulates with Miltonic grandeur anyway. David is framed as fallen, proud, and obsessed with creation. But instead of Paradise Lost, we get Jason X in a toga.

  • David is a hack Dr. Frankenstein (minus any moral dilemma).
  • He talks about creation, but treats its consequences like: “Oh well—stuff happens.”
  • He’s not nihilistic. He’s not visionary. He’s just aimless.

I think the film wants a god wrestling with morality. What we get is a philosophy crib sheet with a superiority complex. There’s so much fodder for a truly compelling tale that could include creation, autonomy, grief, embodiment. But the execution is confused and emotionally hollow.

If Alien: Covenant had embraced its true nature—a slasher flick in space—it might’ve worked. It’s closer to that than philosophical horror, and that would’ve blessedly shaved off 25 minutes.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Big Deal on Madonna Street (1958) - it is a good deal better than the remakes

I got around to watching the original 1958 comedy caper film - the one that "Welcome to Collinwood" was pantomiming. "Big Deal on Madonna Street" is hilarious. It is 25 minutes longer than the remake and never once did I feel the need to check my watch. I even paused to go refill my water glass. There will be no problem telling who is who or how the story goes - it is well shot and characters are unique. The story is a simple and fun. Comparing the "BDoMS" and "WtC" - they are identical in terms of characters and scenes. "Big Deal on Madonna Street" street is terrific, and "WtC" is a slog. The biggest difference is seen in the dialog. In "Big Deal" the people just talk, like you might expect people to talk. They are funny, but not odd. The colloquialisms happen, but they aren't hard to see through. In "WtC", they are using a vernacular to make sure you are immersed deep in an Eastern European ethnic nei...

Lara Croft vs. Tony Stark - a comparison of Earth's mightiest defenders

I watched “Lara Croft: Tomb Raider” (2001) recently. It is not nearly the deep exploration of the human psyche I remembered. Maybe that is why I had time to think that her story has a lot of similarities to the MCU Iron Man, just smashed into a single movie. There is not the same degree of character growth for Croft as for Stark, but there is an archetype here that stuck me. They are both: Athletic with distinctly styled dark brown hair Exceptionally smart & adventurous Utilize clever tools and gadgets Snarky / Funny / Patronizing to the people around Attended to by an attractive personal assistant Rich / Entitled / Play(boy/girl) / Philanthropist-ish Compelled to protect the world from BIG evil Driven by living up to a relationship with father In terms of contrasts: Laura Croft rides a motorcycle, listens to hip-hop and talks with a posh (and yet reed thin) English accent. Tony Stark was able to build [a hockey puck sized nuclear reactor] in a cave! With a box of scraps!  (Jef...

Running with the Devil (2019) - Ok folks, let's make a ¿something?

How do you take a 100 minute movie with Nick Cage, Larry Fishburne, Leslie Bibb, and Barry Pepper - as well as Cole Hauser, Adam Goldberg and Peter Facinelli - and somehow make an unwatchable stew of tones and over the top cliches? I think you give it to a TV director, TV writer, and TV editor. I could not actually finish it. Even for me, that is pretty bad.  It is a series of scenes that could have been part of a TV-series, but they weren’t. They were just the beats from a TV-series. Maybe it was put together by some people who read the wikipedia article for “Traffic” (2000) - then sketched a storyboard for a telenovela - then remembered they were making a movie and just cut it back down from there. It is like it has been sequentially translated into 2 different languages, each time by someone who wasn’t a native speaker. Set designs were thrifty, but not too cheap. Cinematography is somehow gray and lurid at the same time. If there was a highlight, it is the music. It was the onl...