Skip to main content

Lara Croft vs. Tony Stark - a comparison of Earth's mightiest defenders


I watched “Lara Croft: Tomb Raider” (2001) recently. It is not nearly the deep exploration of the human psyche I remembered. Maybe that is why I had time to think that her story has a lot of similarities to the MCU Iron Man, just smashed into a single movie. There is not the same degree of character growth for Croft as for Stark, but there is an archetype here that stuck me.

They are both:

  • Athletic with distinctly styled dark brown hair

  • Exceptionally smart & adventurous

  • Utilize clever tools and gadgets

  • Snarky / Funny / Patronizing to the people around

  • Attended to by an attractive personal assistant

  • Rich / Entitled / Play(boy/girl) / Philanthropist-ish

  • Compelled to protect the world from BIG evil

  • Driven by living up to a relationship with father


In terms of contrasts:

Laura Croft rides a motorcycle, listens to hip-hop and talks with a posh (and yet reed thin) English accent.

Tony Stark was able to build [a hockey puck sized nuclear reactor] in a cave! With a box of scraps! 

(Jeff Bridges is the best)

That sums them up.


I am not sure that there is the same character development for video games as there is for comic books. I suspect LC started as an aesthetic style first, and her persona came in later - probably a lot of it being rounded out as part of the movie making. In contrast - TS has been a character in the making since his origin in the 60’s. 


Regardless, I wonder if this list is what young males dream about being. More likely this is what movie studios, comic book publishers, and video game designers can package that they think that young males should dream about being. That is probably how these archetypes are defined - a smoking hot meatloaf of relatable and unrealistic characteristics with just enough clothes + makeup to get you to think that could really be you (for about 110 minutes anyway).


As an aside - if you decide to gift “Lara Croft: Tomb Raider” with a rewatch, let me know what you think about Rachel Weisz’ husband’s accent - it was a real hit and miss thing for me. He had it cranked up an octave to get his ‘Murican on. I think he tried his best, but it is glaringly obvious that after a while they gave up and ADR’d much of his dialogue. If you get confused and end up watching the 2003 “Lara Croft: Tomb Raider – The Cradle of Life” instead - that is Gerry Butler, and he doesn’t bother trying to sound anything but Scottish. Thank goodness.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Big Deal on Madonna Street (1958) - it is a good deal better than the remakes

I got around to watching the original 1958 comedy caper film - the one that "Welcome to Collinwood" was pantomiming. "Big Deal on Madonna Street" is hilarious. It is 25 minutes longer than the remake and never once did I feel the need to check my watch. I even paused to go refill my water glass. There will be no problem telling who is who or how the story goes - it is well shot and characters are unique. The story is a simple and fun. Comparing the "BDoMS" and "WtC" - they are identical in terms of characters and scenes. "Big Deal on Madonna Street" street is terrific, and "WtC" is a slog. The biggest difference is seen in the dialog. In "Big Deal" the people just talk, like you might expect people to talk. They are funny, but not odd. The colloquialisms happen, but they aren't hard to see through. In "WtC", they are using a vernacular to make sure you are immersed deep in an Eastern European ethnic nei...
Post a Comment
Read more

Alien: Covenant (2017) - Jason X in a toga

A film that raises big questions—about gods, monsters, and the cost of creation—and then answers them with pseudo-intellectual hooha and a bunch of splatters. It’s poetry for meatballs. A creation myth written by someone who forgot the difference between being mysterious and confounding. There’s a premise here. But it never shows up on screen. The director described the film as having [layers of metaphor].  By minute 20, my response to him would be: “Uh nah bruh … you ain’t that deep.” The characters are emotionally unbalanced idiots. This crew is supposedly trained for deep interstellar colonization. No backup plan. No safety protocols. No sense of hierarchy or mission discipline. They panic, scream, and grieve like they’ve just lost soulmates—they are too young to have known each other or been through anything more severe than a power point presentation. They lack agency. They don’t make decisions—they react, flail, and sometimes avoid shooting themselves or blowing themselves up...
Post a Comment
Read more

"Cocaine Shark" (2023) - Not since "Suburban Sasquatch" ...

Mark Polonia has made almost 80 films since 1985. That is 2+ per year. There was a 3 year pause in his proliferation after his twin brother & production partner John died in 2008. If you consider that he (they) didn’t really start cranking out this entertainment until 2000 - it is more like 3 per year. If he keeps at it as long as they did, he will pass Richard Thorpe and William Beaudine (credited as directing ~180 each). Wowzers. His particular craft is low-low budget. Lower than Roger Corman or Lloyd Kaufman even. Polonia’s production values are limited. You get 2 or 3 sets with plenty of establishing shots to fill the transition. You get special effects and creatures which look like they were assembled by a junior high art class. You will see the same actor playing multiple parts, married couples acting together, and a lot of the same names showing up in multiple different releases. You will see the same people + sets in 2 or 4 of these movies in a room; I assume many of them a...
Post a Comment
Read more