Skip to main content

The Beekeeper & The Third Man

 I saw 2 movies recently:

"The Beekeeper" (2024) -- who says you can't make gonzo cinema anymore? Children today will grow up and watch this alongside "Con Air" (1997) or "Face Off" (1997) as examples of stupidly entertaining cinema. Acting students will memorize Jeremy Irons lines as monologues* for class. I almost bailed out at the 10-minute mark because the predation on Phylicia Rashad really bothered me. She was very compelling. Right after that tragically brilliant piece of character the film double clutched into coocoo banana pants gear and took off on a streak.

"The Third Man" (1949) is brilliant -- Orson Welles makes an entrance!** There are entrances and then there are ENTRANCES. Mr. Welles definitely did the latter. If it is possible, I think he is underrated as both an actor and director. All the characters are fun - the dialogue (in multiple languages) does a really good job of increasing the tension. The camera work and music play a real role in pulling you along. It is a really well-made movie. Joseph Cotton is a movie star for sure, but my favorite performance was Ernst Deutsch as 'Baron Kurtz'. His work with that tiny dog and his smile are devious.

* If they are wise, they will also recall Gene Simmons in "Never Too Young to Die" (1986)

** Josh Hutcherson makes an ENTRAance in "The Beekeeper" which is memorable as well.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Big Deal on Madonna Street (1958) - it is a good deal better than the remakes

I got around to watching the original 1958 comedy caper film - the one that "Welcome to Collinwood" was pantomiming. "Big Deal on Madonna Street" is hilarious. It is 25 minutes longer than the remake and never once did I feel the need to check my watch. I even paused to go refill my water glass. There will be no problem telling who is who or how the story goes - it is well shot and characters are unique. The story is a simple and fun. Comparing the "BDoMS" and "WtC" - they are identical in terms of characters and scenes. "Big Deal on Madonna Street" street is terrific, and "WtC" is a slog. The biggest difference is seen in the dialog. In "Big Deal" the people just talk, like you might expect people to talk. They are funny, but not odd. The colloquialisms happen, but they aren't hard to see through. In "WtC", they are using a vernacular to make sure you are immersed deep in an Eastern European ethnic nei...

Lara Croft vs. Tony Stark - a comparison of Earth's mightiest defenders

I watched “Lara Croft: Tomb Raider” (2001) recently. It is not nearly the deep exploration of the human psyche I remembered. Maybe that is why I had time to think that her story has a lot of similarities to the MCU Iron Man, just smashed into a single movie. There is not the same degree of character growth for Croft as for Stark, but there is an archetype here that stuck me. They are both: Athletic with distinctly styled dark brown hair Exceptionally smart & adventurous Utilize clever tools and gadgets Snarky / Funny / Patronizing to the people around Attended to by an attractive personal assistant Rich / Entitled / Play(boy/girl) / Philanthropist-ish Compelled to protect the world from BIG evil Driven by living up to a relationship with father In terms of contrasts: Laura Croft rides a motorcycle, listens to hip-hop and talks with a posh (and yet reed thin) English accent. Tony Stark was able to build [a hockey puck sized nuclear reactor] in a cave! With a box of scraps!  (Jef...

Running with the Devil (2019) - Ok folks, let's make a ¿something?

How do you take a 100 minute movie with Nick Cage, Larry Fishburne, Leslie Bibb, and Barry Pepper - as well as Cole Hauser, Adam Goldberg and Peter Facinelli - and somehow make an unwatchable stew of tones and over the top cliches? I think you give it to a TV director, TV writer, and TV editor. I could not actually finish it. Even for me, that is pretty bad.  It is a series of scenes that could have been part of a TV-series, but they weren’t. They were just the beats from a TV-series. Maybe it was put together by some people who read the wikipedia article for “Traffic” (2000) - then sketched a storyboard for a telenovela - then remembered they were making a movie and just cut it back down from there. It is like it has been sequentially translated into 2 different languages, each time by someone who wasn’t a native speaker. Set designs were thrifty, but not too cheap. Cinematography is somehow gray and lurid at the same time. If there was a highlight, it is the music. It was the onl...