Skip to main content

The Beekeeper & The Third Man

 I saw 2 movies recently:

"The Beekeeper" (2024) -- who says you can't make gonzo cinema anymore? Children today will grow up and watch this alongside "Con Air" (1997) or "Face Off" (1997) as examples of stupidly entertaining cinema. Acting students will memorize Jeremy Irons lines as monologues* for class. I almost bailed out at the 10-minute mark because the predation on Phylicia Rashad really bothered me. She was very compelling. Right after that tragically brilliant piece of character the film double clutched into coocoo banana pants gear and took off on a streak.

"The Third Man" (1949) is brilliant -- Orson Welles makes an entrance!** There are entrances and then there are ENTRANCES. Mr. Welles definitely did the latter. If it is possible, I think he is underrated as both an actor and director. All the characters are fun - the dialogue (in multiple languages) does a really good job of increasing the tension. The camera work and music play a real role in pulling you along. It is a really well-made movie. Joseph Cotton is a movie star for sure, but my favorite performance was Ernst Deutsch as 'Baron Kurtz'. His work with that tiny dog and his smile are devious.

* If they are wise, they will also recall Gene Simmons in "Never Too Young to Die" (1986)

** Josh Hutcherson makes an ENTRAance in "The Beekeeper" which is memorable as well.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Big Deal on Madonna Street (1958) - it is a good deal better than the remakes

I got around to watching the original 1958 comedy caper film - the one that "Welcome to Collinwood" was pantomiming. "Big Deal on Madonna Street" is hilarious. It is 25 minutes longer than the remake and never once did I feel the need to check my watch. I even paused to go refill my water glass. There will be no problem telling who is who or how the story goes - it is well shot and characters are unique. The story is a simple and fun. Comparing the "BDoMS" and "WtC" - they are identical in terms of characters and scenes. "Big Deal on Madonna Street" street is terrific, and "WtC" is a slog. The biggest difference is seen in the dialog. In "Big Deal" the people just talk, like you might expect people to talk. They are funny, but not odd. The colloquialisms happen, but they aren't hard to see through. In "WtC", they are using a vernacular to make sure you are immersed deep in an Eastern European ethnic nei...

Alien: Covenant (2017) - Jason X in a toga

A film that raises big questions—about gods, monsters, and the cost of creation—and then answers them with pseudo-intellectual hooha and a bunch of splatters. It’s poetry for meatballs. A creation myth written by someone who forgot the difference between being mysterious and confounding. There’s a premise here. But it never shows up on screen. The director described the film as having [layers of metaphor].  By minute 20, my response to him would be: “Uh nah bruh … you ain’t that deep.” The characters are emotionally unbalanced idiots. This crew is supposedly trained for deep interstellar colonization. No backup plan. No safety protocols. No sense of hierarchy or mission discipline. They panic, scream, and grieve like they’ve just lost soulmates—they are too young to have known each other or been through anything more severe than a power point presentation. They lack agency. They don’t make decisions—they react, flail, and sometimes avoid shooting themselves or blowing themselves up...

"Cocaine Shark" (2023) - Not since "Suburban Sasquatch" ...

Mark Polonia has made almost 80 films since 1985. That is 2+ per year. There was a 3 year pause in his proliferation after his twin brother & production partner John died in 2008. If you consider that he (they) didn’t really start cranking out this entertainment until 2000 - it is more like 3 per year. If he keeps at it as long as they did, he will pass Richard Thorpe and William Beaudine (credited as directing ~180 each). Wowzers. His particular craft is low-low budget. Lower than Roger Corman or Lloyd Kaufman even. Polonia’s production values are limited. You get 2 or 3 sets with plenty of establishing shots to fill the transition. You get special effects and creatures which look like they were assembled by a junior high art class. You will see the same actor playing multiple parts, married couples acting together, and a lot of the same names showing up in multiple different releases. You will see the same people + sets in 2 or 4 of these movies in a room; I assume many of them a...