Scooby Doo (1969) - thoughts?

Today on Scooby Doo:

* The gang place a miniature radio tracker on Scooby and then used a directional antenna and mapping equipment to find him. This stuff was apparently already installed in the van. I am still baffled by their income situation and what defines "kids" - in the first episode, they were definitely in high school ... today I figure they have gone rogue from the NSA.

* Shaggy ate a Scooby Snack on purpose and like it.

* Shaggy had several punch lines that the audience did not laugh at - I felt sorry for him - he was the ultimate actor and kept in the scene despite what must have been a little heart breaking. Sometimes the crowd just isn't with you Shag.

* Shaggy referenced the "Batusi" when he and Velma were dancing around while being swarmed by bats. This is 3 years after it was introduced in the Batman episode "Hi Diddle Riddle". Is this a case of co-evolution, do they exist in the same universe, or does Shaggy watch the same TV we do?

* Velma can't see a thing without her glasses - as bad as it is, I would have her get an elastic strap that goes behind her head.

I realize these reports are a little Shaggy and Velma heavy. That is because I do not care much about Fred or Daphne. I did notice that she frequently refers to him as 'Freddy'. I will let you know if he ever calls her 'Daph-a-licious'. I can go either way on the titular doggo.

The other thing with Scooby Doo - they are always driving around in the dark in some creepy place in that van ... four "kids" in a van driving to somewhere and ending up with a ghost mystery. Where are they going? Where is the money for gas and hotels coming from? What defined "kid" in 1969

Did you know that Shaggy was a gymnast? That Scooby-Doo was a Great Dane? That Velma can't see a thing without her glasses?

The animation is really inexpensively done - lots of frames with only 1 part of the image moving at a time.

Comments

Big Deal on Madonna Street (1958) - it is a good deal better than the remakes

I got around to watching the original 1958 comedy caper film - the one that "Welcome to Collinwood" was pantomiming. "Big Deal on Madonna Street" is hilarious. It is 25 minutes longer than the remake and never once did I feel the need to check my watch. I even paused to go refill my water glass. There will be no problem telling who is who or how the story goes - it is well shot and characters are unique. The story is a simple and fun. Comparing the "BDoMS" and "WtC" - they are identical in terms of characters and scenes. "Big Deal on Madonna Street" street is terrific, and "WtC" is a slog. The biggest difference is seen in the dialog. In "Big Deal" the people just talk, like you might expect people to talk. They are funny, but not odd. The colloquialisms happen, but they aren't hard to see through. In "WtC", they are using a vernacular to make sure you are immersed deep in an Eastern European ethnic nei...

Lara Croft vs. Tony Stark - a comparison of Earth's mightiest defenders

I watched “Lara Croft: Tomb Raider” (2001) recently. It is not nearly the deep exploration of the human psyche I remembered. Maybe that is why I had time to think that her story has a lot of similarities to the MCU Iron Man, just smashed into a single movie. There is not the same degree of character growth for Croft as for Stark, but there is an archetype here that stuck me. They are both: Athletic with distinctly styled dark brown hair Exceptionally smart & adventurous Utilize clever tools and gadgets Snarky / Funny / Patronizing to the people around Attended to by an attractive personal assistant Rich / Entitled / Play(boy/girl) / Philanthropist-ish Compelled to protect the world from BIG evil Driven by living up to a relationship with father In terms of contrasts: Laura Croft rides a motorcycle, listens to hip-hop and talks with a posh (and yet reed thin) English accent. Tony Stark was able to build [a hockey puck sized nuclear reactor] in a cave! With a box of scraps! (Jef...

Running with the Devil (2019) - Ok folks, let's make a ¿something?

How do you take a 100 minute movie with Nick Cage, Larry Fishburne, Leslie Bibb, and Barry Pepper - as well as Cole Hauser, Adam Goldberg and Peter Facinelli - and somehow make an unwatchable stew of tones and over the top cliches? I think you give it to a TV director, TV writer, and TV editor. I could not actually finish it. Even for me, that is pretty bad. It is a series of scenes that could have been part of a TV-series, but they weren’t. They were just the beats from a TV-series. Maybe it was put together by some people who read the wikipedia article for “Traffic” (2000) - then sketched a storyboard for a telenovela - then remembered they were making a movie and just cut it back down from there. It is like it has been sequentially translated into 2 different languages, each time by someone who wasn’t a native speaker. Set designs were thrifty, but not too cheap. Cinematography is somehow gray and lurid at the same time. If there was a highlight, it is the music. It was the onl...

Robs takes on Media and Entertainment

Search This Blog