Skip to main content

"Repeat Performance" (1947) - être noir ou juste noir et blanc

 

This is supposedly categorized as noir, but I think it is missing some key components. There is a crime, but it lacks the cynical attitudes and motivations. There are aspects of the lighting style which are in the neighborhood of noir, but it is more about the dramatic effect of the set design. I guess there is a femme fatale (maybe two of them), but she is an antagonist to the heroine more than a key element. You could have swapped them out for any number of alternatives. I don’t think this is noir - just black and white.


This movie is a fantasy film similar to the Frank Capra flick. It is about doing the year 1946 over. There is a very short, narrated voice over when the time jump happens that tells the audience - Joan Leslie is the only one who will know. She is second billed, but this movie is ALL her.  She is attempting to avoid the tragic circumstances of the previous year - and makes a very believable case for what a human person would do in that situation. Her husband is a lush and distraught over his professional failure and so he drinks, is abusive, and has an affair.


If there is one thing that didn’t make sense to me is what either Joan Leslie or Virginia Field saw in him. Ms Field is a female cad, but a successful and driven professional … so I never quite understood why she would want that sot in the first place. Joan's loyalty made some sense, but she could clearly do better.


Natalie Shafer is here. At 47 years old she looks gorgeous. She was 64 on “Giligan’s Island” (13 years older than Jim Backus - and supposedly concerned enough about that to make demands on how she was lit & shot). It is not much of a part - she is playing a dramatic version of Lovey Howell. Tim Conway is supposedly also in this movie, but he would have been ~13, so while I looked for him, I don’t think I recognized him.


There was a remake of this thing made for NBC in 1989 - I found a Spanish dubbed version on YouTube (“Regresar al Pasado”). It is not as good as the original, but it is faithful to the story & characters. Even in Spanish at 2x playback it made me remember when we used to have TV movies like this. It stars one of the great [Ladies of the 80’s] Connie Sellecca. If we had Mount Rushmore for 80~90’s leading ladies; well … I can’t see her bumping off Anne Archer, Bonnie Bedelia, Kathleen Turner or Angela Bassett, but she would be in the conversation. Tourists would argue with each other at the gift shop about her being overlooked.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

They Live (1988)

 "They Live" (1988) is a movie I had never seen until last night when I went over to my sister's place. What a gem (my sister and this movie). Roddy Piper does some of his best work - which even for a Canadian is pretty dull. If, while watching it, you imagine that he never heard the director call 'action', then his performance makes total sense. Offsetting this is any scene where Keith David or Peter Jason are in. They are acting their butts of and are enthralling. (Just so you don't get confused - Peter Jason is neither Meatloaf nor Jason Sudekis' father ... You might think he is, but he isn't). The movie itself is a 94 minute indictment on Reagonmics, and gets plenty preachy. It would be under an hour of you cut out the establishing shots of people walking. But - THE REASON this movie needs to be seen - is a fight scene between Roddy and Keith. It goes on for 5+ minutes - you think it is over at least 3 times - it has all the beats of a professional...

Big Deal on Madonna Street (1958) - it is a good deal better than the remakes

I got around to watching the original 1958 comedy caper film - the one that "Welcome to Collinwood" was pantomiming. "Big Deal on Madonna Street" is hilarious. It is 25 minutes longer than the remake and never once did I feel the need to check my watch. I even paused to go refill my water glass. There will be no problem telling who is who or how the story goes - it is well shot and characters are unique. The story is a simple and fun. Comparing the "BDoMS" and "WtC" - they are identical in terms of characters and scenes. "Big Deal on Madonna Street" street is terrific, and "WtC" is a slog. The biggest difference is seen in the dialog. In "Big Deal" the people just talk, like you might expect people to talk. They are funny, but not odd. The colloquialisms happen, but they aren't hard to see through. In "WtC", they are using a vernacular to make sure you are immersed deep in an Eastern European ethnic nei...

Con Air (1997) - another example of the Jacob's ladder effect

As we work our way through Merry Cage-mas, an argument could be made that "Con Air" is a fever dream Nick Cage's character has just before dying during that opening bar fight. 1) Monica Potter has abs of steel and is supposedly pregnant with their daughter. She is so not pregnant looking. So much so that, I do not know how they would have been far enough along to ultrasound the embryo. Additionally, he has just walked off a fishing boat into the bar she works at after getting home from deployment - when was the child conceived? 2) Nick Cage is immediately arrested and  sentenced to seven years in prison. During the film he writes & received fully formed letters from this child. In them, he talks about all the things they used to do with each other. When did these things happen?  3) Upon making his way into the titular 'Con Air' plane, Nick Cage has a shrink wrapped bunny rabbit doll he bought for this little girl as a present. Where did that come from? The pri...